Breaking News: Reality is crumbling

The Daily Absurdity

Unfiltered. Unverified. Unbelievable.

Home/Politics

Prince Andrew vs. Keir Starmer: Why the Push for Congress Testimony on Epstein is Political Theater

Philomena O'Connor
Written by
Philomena O'ConnorIrony Consultant
Sunday, February 1, 2026
Share this story
A conceptual illustration in a satirical political cartoon style. The image shows a crumbling stone crown sitting on an empty witness stand. In the background, a silhouette of a man in a suit points a finger at the empty chair. The lighting is dramatic and shadowy, emphasizing a mood of decay and theater.

It is honestly hard to watch without laughing. It is a dark, dry laugh, the kind you let out when you realize the people running the world are just actors who forgot their lines. We have a new viral episode in the never-ending soap opera of the **British elite**, and it is as pathetic as you might expect. **Prime Minister Keir Starmer** has decided to puff out his chest. He is formally urging the man formerly known as **Prince Andrew** to go to the United States and provide **testimony to Congress** regarding his ties to **Jeffrey Epstein**.

Let us take a moment to appreciate the sheer absurdity of this. The Prime Minister is a man who usually has the charisma of a waiting room chair. But now, he sees a chance to look tough. He looks at Andrew, a man who has already been stripped of his titles during the **King Charles III** reshuffle, kicked out of his job, and hidden away by his own family, and decides this is the perfect target. It is brave, isn't it? It is like a hunter bragging about shooting a deer that was already tied to a tree.

Let’s be honest about what is happening here regarding the **Royal Family brand**. Andrew is no longer a working royal. His brother, King Charles III, made sure of that. In a move that was less about brotherly love and more about saving the family business, Charles took away the titles. He stripped Andrew down to just "Mr. Mountbatten-Windsor." It was a cold, calculated business decision. The monarchy is a brand, like a soft drink or a running shoe. If one of your products is poisonous, you take it off the shelf. You throw it in the trash. That is what Charles did. He cleaned house because he had to.

So why is the Prime Minister getting involved now? Why is he demanding that this private citizen go face the music in America? The answer is simple, cynical, and tailored for the news cycle. It is because governing a country is actually very hard. Fixing roads, lowering prices, and making sure the hospitals work takes real effort. It takes time. And often, politicians fail at it. But yelling at a disgraced prince? That is easy. That is free. It costs Starmer nothing to say, "Go testify." It makes him look like he cares about justice. It makes him look like a leader.

But it is all smoke. Does anyone really think Andrew is going to hop on a plane to Washington to discuss the **Epstein investigation**? He knows better. He knows that the American legal system is not like the polite, gentle world of British royalty. Over there, they do not bow. They ask questions. Hard questions. Andrew has spent years avoiding this. He gave that disastrous interview where he talked about pizza restaurants and his inability to sweat. He thought he could charm his way out of it. He failed. Now, he stays behind high walls. Starmer knows Andrew won’t go. That is why it is safe to ask him to.

This whole situation reveals the rotting core of the establishment. You have the Royals, desperate to pretend they are still relevant and moral, cutting off their own limbs to survive. You have the politicians, desperate for a distraction, pointing fingers at the Royals. It is a game of "pass the blame." Meanwhile, the shadow of **Jeffrey Epstein** hangs over all of them. It is the ghost that will not leave the party. It reminds us that these powerful men protected each other for years. They went to the parties. They flew on the planes. And now that the ship is sinking, they are pushing each other into the water to save themselves.

The public is supposed to cheer for Starmer. We are supposed to say, "Good on you, Prime Minister! Make him talk!" But we should not be fooled. This isn't justice. It is theater. If Starmer really wanted to change things, he would look at the systems that allow people like Andrew to exist in the first place. But he won't do that. That is too hard. It is much easier to play the role of the stern schoolteacher scolding the naughty boy in the corner.

In the end, nothing will change. Andrew will stay in his big house, or a slightly smaller one, hiding from the world. Starmer will go back to not fixing the economy. And the rest of us will watch, shaking our heads, wondering why we keep paying for tickets to this terrible, terrible show.

***

### References & Fact-Check * **Event Context:** Prime Minister Keir Starmer has publicly urged Prince Andrew (now Mr. Mountbatten-Windsor) to cooperate with US Congressional inquiries regarding Jeffrey Epstein. * **Royal Status:** Prince Andrew was stripped of his military titles and royal patronages by the Monarchy following the scandal. * **Source:** [Starmer Urges Former Prince Andrew to Testify to Congress Over Epstein Ties](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/01/world/europe/andrew-mountbatten-windsor-jeffrey-epstein.html) - *The New York Times*

This story is an interpreted work of social commentary based on real events. Source: NY Times

Distribute the Absurdity

Enjoying the Apocalypse?

Journalism is dead, but our server costs are very much alive. Throw a coin to your local cynic to keep the lights on while we watch the world burn.

Tax Deductible? Probably Not.

Comments (0)

Loading comments...