Breaking News: Reality is crumbling

The Daily Absurdity

Unfiltered. Unverified. Unbelievable.

Home/Americas

The Insurrection Act: Because Nothing Says 'Law and Order' Like Turning the National Mall Into a Garrison

Buck Valor
Written by
Buck ValorPersiflating Non-Journalist
Saturday, January 17, 2026
Share this story
A wide-angle, low-perspective photograph of the United States Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C. under a heavy, overcast gray sky. The white marble architecture is sharp and imposing, with the 'Equal Justice Under Law' inscription clearly visible above the columns. There are no people in the immediate foreground, emphasizing a sense of cold, static institutional power.

Welcome to the latest episode of 'Will the Republic Fold Like a Cheap Suit?' Today’s contestant is the Insurrection Act—a dusty 1807 relic that’s being pulled out of the attic like a forgotten heirloom because someone finally realized that yelling on social media doesn’t quite have the same visceral impact as ten thousand National Guard troops in tactical gear.

The premise for invoking it is being called 'flimsy.' As if everything in Washington isn't currently held together by scotch tape, careerism, and the collective hallucination that anyone actually follows the rules anymore. Trump’s 'gambit' is less about national security and more about the ultimate HR policy: if you don’t like the people protesting your management style, you bring in the guys with the rifles to suggest they find a different hobby. It’s not strategy; it’s a feasibility study on how much the American public will tolerate before they go back to scrolling for brunch pictures.

And then we have the Supreme Court. Our black-robed guardians of tradition will handle this with the urgency of a sloth on Xanax. They’ll spend months debating the linguistic nuance of 'domestic violence' and 'civil disorder' while the rest of us wonder if the Lincoln Memorial is about to become a fortified bunker. They love a good procedural hurdle. It allows them to look busy and scholarly without actually having to tell a powerful man 'no' in a way that might ruin a cocktail party.

The talking heads are in a choreographed frenzy about 'abuses of power.' Newsflash: power is only ever 'abused' when the guy you didn't vote for has his hand on the lever. When your side does it, it’s 'decisive leadership.' When the other guy does it, it’s Caesar crossing the Rubicon. Meanwhile, the Insurrection Act remains the ultimate 'In Case of Emergency, Break Norms' glass box that both sides are itching to smash.

We’re not watching a legal debate; we’re watching political theater where the actors have forgotten their lines and started improvising with live ammunition. Trump provides the script, the media provides the megaphone, and SCOTUS provides the slow-motion instant replay that nobody asked for. It’s not an insurrection; it’s an audition for a version of democracy that looks suspiciously like a military parade.

This story is an interpreted work of social commentary based on real events. Source: Slate

Distribute the Absurdity

Enjoying the Apocalypse?

Journalism is dead, but our server costs are very much alive. Throw a coin to your local cynic to keep the lights on while we watch the world burn.

Tax Deductible? Probably Not.

Comments (0)

Loading comments...
The Insurrection Act: Because Nothing Says 'Law and Order' Like Turning the National Mall Into a Garrison | The Daily Absurdity