Look at the United Kingdom. It is a rainy little island where nothing works. The trains are late. The food is gray. And now, thanks to a botched attempt at utilizing **UK terrorism laws**, we find out that the government does not even know how to enact a **Palestine Action ban** without tripping over its own shoelaces.

Here is the story. It is simple. It is stupid. It is a perfect example of why I hate modern politics, but it is trending, so pay attention.

There is a group called **Palestine Action**. You might know them. They are the ones who climb on roofs. They smash windows. They throw red paint on buildings. They target factories owned by an Israeli defense company. They are loud. They are annoying. They break things because they think it will save the world. It won’t, but that is what they think.

The British government looked at these people. The politicians saw the broken glass. They saw the red paint. And they got mad. Politicians hate looking weak. They hate it when people ignore the rules. So, they decided to bring out the big hammer to maximize their 'tough on crime' metrics. They wanted to ban this group.

But they didn’t just give them a ticket for vandalism. No, that would make too much sense. The government decided to label them as a "terrorist" group.

Think about that keyword for a second: Terrorist. We used to use that word for people who blew up buses. We used it for people who hijacked planes. Now, apparently, it applies to a college student with a hammer and a bucket of paint. The government tried to say that smashing a window at a factory is the same thing as a terror attack.

This is why nobody trusts politicians. They take words and stretch them until they snap. They wanted to scare these protesters. They wanted to lock them up for a long time. They wanted to look tough for the search algorithms.

So, what happened? The **High Court ruling** happened.

The court took a look at this ban. The judges looked at the government’s homework. And they gave it a failing grade. The **High Court ruled that the ban was unlawful**. They said it was "disproportionate." That is a fancy lawyer word. It means the government went too far. It means you cannot use a bazooka to kill a fly.

The court said the ban breached **free speech rights** and the **right to protest**.

Now, do not get me wrong. I am not cheering for the people throwing paint. I think they are performative narcissists. They want attention more than they want solutions. They love the cameras. They love feeling like heroes because they climbed a ladder. But the government is even worse.

The government tried to cheat. They tried to use the scariest law they have—the Terrorism Act—to stop a property crime. It is lazy. It is dangerous. If you let the government call vandalism "terrorism," pretty soon they will call everything terrorism. If you jaywalk aggressively, are you a terrorist? If you yell too loud at a mayor, are you a terrorist?

The judges saw through it. They said there was no evidence that this group was actually involved in terrorism. Because, obviously, they weren't. They were involved in being a nuisance. There is a difference. A big difference.

But here is the punchline. This is the part that proves the system is a joke.

The government lost the case. The court said the ban was wrong. So, you would think the ban is over, right? You would think the group is legal again.

Wrong.

The government said, "We are going to appeal." They are going to fight the ruling. They are going to spend more tax money on more lawyers to argue the same stupid point again. And because they are appealing, the ban stays in place for now.

Read that again. The court said the law is bad. But the law is still happening.

The group is still banned. It is still a crime to belong to it. The government lost, but they are still acting like they won. It is a zombie law. It is dead, but it keeps walking around and biting people.

This is why everything is broken. The activists are running around breaking things. The government is running around abusing the legal system. The courts are stuck in the middle, writing long papers that nobody reads.

Nobody is fixing anything. The conflict in the Middle East is not going to stop because someone smashed a window in England. The streets of London are not going to be safer because the Home Office lied about the definition of terrorism.

It is all a game. The politicians on the Right want to look like they are crushing the mob. The activists on the Left want to look like they are fighting the power. They need each other. They feed off each other. The government needs a villain to ban. The activists need a villain to protest.

And the rest of us? We just have to watch. We have to pay for the courts. We have to pay for the police. We have to listen to the whining from both sides.

The government will probably lose the appeal too. They know it. But they don’t care. It buys them time. It keeps the headline in the news. It makes them look like they are "doing something."

That is all politics is now. It is just looking busy while the world burns. The High Court made the right call, but it doesn't matter. The machine keeps grinding. The paint will be cleaned up. The lawyers will get paid. And absolutely nothing will change.

***

### References & Fact-Check * **Original Event**: The UK High Court ruled that the government's attempt to ban Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act 2000 was unlawful and disproportionate. * **Source**: [UK Ban on Palestine Action Is Unlawful, Court Finds](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/13/world/europe/uk-palestine-action-ban-court-ruling.html) - *The New York Times*, February 13, 2026. * **Key Legal Context**: The court determined that while the group committed criminal damage, these actions did not meet the statutory threshold for "terrorism," citing breaches of freedom of expression and the right to protest.