Breaking News: Reality is crumbling

The Daily Absurdity

Unfiltered. Unverified. Unbelievable.

Home/Economy

The Digital Mirage: AI’s Quest to Make Poverty Slightly More Efficient

Buck Valor
Written by
Buck ValorPersiflating Non-Journalist
Thursday, October 23, 2025
Share this story
A hyper-realistic, cynical digital art piece of a golden robotic hand offering a hollow, glowing silicon chip to a crowd of starving, faceless people in a dusty wasteland, while in the background, gleaming ivory towers of Silicon Valley reflect off a layer of thick, industrial smog.

Once again, the high priests of the cult of progress have emerged from their glass cathedrals in Palo Alto to offer the starving masses a new sacrament: the Large Language Model. The premise, predictably dripping with the kind of nauseating optimism usually reserved for lottery winners and MLM recruiters, asks if Artificial Intelligence can make the poor world richer. It is a question so profoundly stupid it almost deserves an award for its audacity. The "level playing field" is the oldest lie in the colonial playbook, re-skinned for a generation that thinks history started with the release of the first iPhone. It’s a beautiful thought if you’re the kind of person who believes a software update can fix a house that lacks a foundation.

The "level playing field"—a metaphor so overused it has lost all its texture—is the favorite trope of the techno-optimist. We are told that a subsistence farmer in sub-Saharan Africa or a garment worker in Bangladesh will now have the same "access to information" as a hedge fund manager in Manhattan. This assumes, of course, that the farmer has a stable electrical grid, high-speed internet, and the luxury of time to consult a chatbot about crop rotation while the climate they didn't ruin incinerates their livelihood. It is the intellectual equivalent of handing a drowning man a waterproof instruction manual on how to swim and calling it a rescue mission. The arrogance required to suggest that code can replace calories is perhaps the only thing currently growing faster than AI’s processing power.

Let us look at the historical precedents, shall we? The Industrial Revolution was supposed to bring prosperity to all. Instead, it provided the machinery for more efficient empire-building and the systematic extraction of resources from the very "poor world" we are now allegedly trying to save. The internet was heralded as the great democratizer, a digital agora where everyone would have a voice and a seat at the table. Decades later, it has primarily succeeded in centralizing global wealth into a handful of tax-avoiding platforms while providing the masses with a 24/7 stream of algorithmic brain rot and state surveillance. Why would AI be any different? Because it can write a mediocre haiku or generate a picture of a cat in a space suit? The tools change, but the hands holding them remain the same.

The Left views this through a lens of performative hand-wringing, demanding "ethical AI" and "inclusive datasets" as if teaching a machine to recognize a variety of skin tones will somehow pay for a primary school or a clean well. They want the benefits of the technological grift without the lingering guilt of the exploitation. Meanwhile, the Right looks at the Global South and sees a redundant labor force. If an AI can handle customer service or basic coding, the meager competitive advantage of low-cost overseas labor evaporates entirely. The "level playing field" isn't about bringing the poor up; it is about making sure the rich don’t have to bother with the poor at all. It is isolationism rebranded as innovation.

The reality of AI is not a digital uplift but a new form of digital feudalism. For these models to function, they require an army of underpaid "data annotators"—often located in Kenya, the Philippines, or India—who spend their days sifting through the dregs of the internet, tagging horrific content so that a suburban teenager in California doesn't have to see it. This is the "miracle" of the new economy: the poor are once again the janitors of the rich's digital fantasies. We are mining their data, their labor, and their attention to build tools that will eventually render their traditional economic roles obsolete. It is a parasitic relationship masquerading as a partnership.

Furthermore, the resource requirements for AI are staggering. The data centers powering these "world-saving" models consume vast amounts of water and energy, often in regions already suffering from scarcity. We are literally burning the planet to compute the best ways to pretend we are saving it. The sheer vacuousness of suggesting that a chatbot can compensate for a lack of infrastructure, education, and healthcare is staggering. You cannot eat an algorithm. You cannot shelter under a cloud-based server. You cannot build a middle class on the back of a technology that is designed specifically to minimize the cost and necessity of human input.

In the end, AI will do exactly what every "leveling" technology has done before it: it will consolidate power in the hands of those who already hold it. The rich world will get richer, the poor world will get a new set of digital tools to manage their poverty, and the gap between the two will widen until the whole farce collapses under the weight of its own hypocrisy. But at least the AI will be able to write a very polite, perfectly phrased apology on behalf of the elites who oversaw the disaster. It’s not progress; it’s just the same old exploitation, now with a faster processor and a more convincing voice. Enjoy the future; it looks exactly like the past, just with better resolution.

This story is an interpreted work of social commentary based on real events. Source: The Economist

Distribute the Absurdity

Enjoying the Apocalypse?

Journalism is dead, but our server costs are very much alive. Throw a coin to your local cynic to keep the lights on while we watch the world burn.

Tax Deductible? Probably Not.

Comments (0)

Loading comments...