The Great Sandpit Schism: Saudi Arabia and the UAE Fight Over Who Gets to Ruin the Red Sea


In the world of geopolitics, 'ally' is a word used by people who haven't yet found a sharp enough knife to fit between their partner's shoulder blades. For years, we were told that Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates were the new power couple of the Middle East—a terrifying union of oil wealth and insecurity that would reshape the region in their image. It turns out that image is just a blurred photograph of two narcissists fighting over a mirror. The latest rift, ostensibly about the Red Sea and the rotting remains of their failed adventure in Yemen, is a masterclass in the sheer, unadulterated vanity of absolute power. These are two regimes that have everything—money, weapons, and a total lack of accountability—and yet they are currently behaving like two toddlers fighting over a single plastic shovel in a sandbox the size of a subcontinent.
Saudi Arabia, led by Mohammed bin Salman—a man who approaches diplomacy with the subtlety of a wrecking ball in a glass factory—has suddenly realized that his neighbors in the UAE have been busy. While Riyadh was wasting billions trying to turn a patch of desert into a neon-lit fever dream called NEOM, the Emiratis were playing a much smarter, more cynical game. Under Mohammed bin Zayed, the UAE has been collecting ports like they’re limited-edition trading cards. From the Horn of Africa to the scorched coastlines of Yemen, Abu Dhabi has established a maritime empire that effectively makes them the toll-collectors of the Red Sea. This has, quite predictably, annoyed the Saudis. There is nothing an absolute monarch hates more than realizing the guy next door has a more efficient way of extracting tribute from the rest of the world.
Let’s look at the Yemen context, the graveyard where this 'brotherhood' went to die. Originally, the two joined forces to 'restore legitimacy'—which in monarch-speak means 'installing a puppet we like.' Instead, they spent years turning the country into a humanitarian catastrophe that would make a Victorian workhouse look like a luxury spa. But even in the middle of a famine, they found time to bicker. The UAE backed one set of militias, the Saudis backed another, and the Yemeni people were left to die in the middle of a proxy war between two countries that were supposedly on the same side. Now, the mask has slipped entirely. Saudi Arabia is moving to 'oust' the UAE’s influence, which is essentially like one arsonist trying to kick another arsonist out of a burning building because he wants to be the one who controls the hose.
The strategic depth they’re fighting over is the Red Sea, a vital artery for global trade and a convenient place to project power. The UAE’s expansionism in places like Eritrea, Somaliland, and Socotra has given them a chokehold on the Bab el-Mandeb strait. Riyadh, suddenly feeling claustrophobic, is now scrambling to form its own 'Red Sea Council' and throwing money at any local strongman willing to take a check in exchange for ignoring Abu Dhabi. It’s a race to the bottom where the prize is the ability to dictate who gets to ship what to where. It’s capitalism stripped of its polite facade, replaced by the raw, grasping ego of two families who think the planet belongs to them because they happened to be sitting on top of the right prehistoric compost heaps.
The irony is almost too thick to breathe. Both regimes present themselves as the stable, modernizing future of the Arab world. They host summits on 'innovation' and 'sustainability' while engaged in a medieval struggle for territory and dominance. They are two versions of the same failure: societies built on the extraction of dead plants, governed by men who view the world as a chessboard and their citizens as pawns they forgot to take out of the box. The Saudi attempt to push the UAE out of the region isn’t about security or stability; it’s about the fact that MBS cannot stand to be the second-most important person in any room, even if that room is the entire Middle East.
Historical parallels are everywhere, if you’re cynical enough to look. This is the Borgias with better PR and more advanced surveillance tech. It’s the late-stage decay of a system where power is concentrated in so few hands that the personal petulance of a prince becomes a matter of international crisis. We are expected to care about which of these two despots controls the ports of the Red Sea, as if the outcome will be anything other than a slightly different flavor of authoritarianism. Whether it’s the Saudi 'Vision 2030' or the UAE’s 'Golden Visas,' the goal is the same: to buy enough time and enough toys to stay relevant while the rest of the world burns.
In the end, this rift is the most honest thing either country has produced in a decade. It reveals the alliance for what it always was: a temporary marriage of convenience between two predators who both want the same piece of meat. As they escalate their 'competition' across Africa and the Levant, we can look forward to more manufactured crises, more wasted billions, and more 'non-journalist' analysis of why we should be worried. Personally, I find it refreshing. It’s rare to see such naked, stupid greed out in the open, unmasked by the usual drivel about 'regional cooperation.' They hate each other almost as much as they despise the concept of a world they can’t control. And honestly? The feeling is mutual.
This story is an interpreted work of social commentary based on real events. Source: Washington Post