Breaking News: Reality is crumbling

The Daily Absurdity

Unfiltered. Unverified. Unbelievable.

Home/EU

Two Titans of Tedium: Elon Musk Threatens to Purchase the Flying Purgatory Known as Ryanair

Buck Valor
Written by
Buck ValorPersiflating Non-Journalist
Tuesday, January 20, 2026
Share this story
A satirical editorial illustration showing Elon Musk and Michael O’Leary as giant, squabbling toddlers in a sandbox shaped like a Ryanair plane, with Musk holding a satellite-shaped toy and O'Leary clutching a handful of coins, oil-painting style, dark and cynical atmosphere.

In the latest episode of 'Narcissists in a Sandpit,' we find ourselves witnessing a collision between the two most grating forces in modern commerce. Elon Musk, a man who appears to be attempting a speedrun of the 'Seven Deadly Sins' category of billionairehood, has floated the idea of buying Ryanair. This isn’t a strategic move born of a desire to revolutionize the aviation industry, nor is it a visionary leap toward the stars. No, it is the corporate equivalent of a playground spat where one child, having been called a name, decides to buy the entire school just to give his rival a permanent detention. The catalyst for this latest display of fragile masculinity was Michael O’Leary, the CEO of Ryanair, who had the audacity to reject Musk’s Starlink satellite internet for his fleet of flying sardine cans.

O’Leary, a man who has built a multi-billion-euro empire on the revolutionary concept of treating human beings like sentient luggage, reportedly called Musk an 'idiot.' This is a classic case of the pot calling the kettle black, though in this instance, the pot is a budget airline mogul who would charge for oxygen if the regulators weren't watching, and the kettle is a tech-bro who thinks he’s saving humanity by turning a social media platform into a digital dumpster fire. O’Leary’s rejection of Starlink is perfectly in character. Ryanair’s business model is built on the rigorous exclusion of anything resembling comfort, dignity, or modern utility. To O’Leary, 'high-speed internet' is a luxury on par with cushioned seats or a pilot who doesn't look like they’ve been awake for forty-eight hours straight. If it costs more than five cents per passenger, it is an existential threat to the Ryanair ethos.

Musk, however, cannot handle the word 'no.' In his world, 'no' is merely a suggestion that he should open his wallet and consume the source of the dissent. His hint at purchasing the Irish carrier is the ultimate move in his ongoing quest to own every medium through which he can project his internal monologue. He already owns the cars we drive and the digital plazas where we argue; why not own the very air we breathe while we are crammed into a metal tube 30,000 feet above the Atlantic? The marriage of Musk and Ryanair is, in many ways, the inevitable conclusion of late-stage capitalism—a grotesque synthesis of O’Leary’s 'pay-per-frown' fee structure and Musk’s 'algorithmic ego' management style.

Imagine, if you will, the horror of a Musk-owned Ryanair. The 'X-Airlines' experience would likely involve a tiered subscription model. For $8 a month, you might get a 'verified' seat belt. The cockpit would be replaced by a 'Full Self-Flying' AI that occasionally decides to target a particularly bright cloud, while the cabin crew is replaced by Optimus robots that malfunction and spend the entire flight trying to sell you Dogecoin. It is a match made in a very specific, very profitable circle of Hell. Both men are cut from the same cloth of performative arrogance, though they wear different costumes. O’Leary plays the role of the no-nonsense, penny-pinching Irishman, while Musk plays the role of the misunderstood genius-savior. In reality, they are both just grifters who have realized that the easiest way to make money is to find a captive audience—whether they’re trapped in a digital feed or a middle seat on a flight to Charleroi—and squeeze them until they squeak.

This spat over Starlink is merely the surface tension of a deeper malaise. It highlights the absurdity of a world where critical infrastructure and global transit are subject to the whims of men who have the emotional maturity of a YouTube comment section. Musk’s threat to buy the airline is a reminder that in the current economy, the only thing more dangerous than a man with a bad idea is a man with a bad idea and an infinite line of credit. If the deal were to go through, we wouldn't see the 'democratization of the skies' that Musk would inevitably tweet about between intervals of self-congratulation. We would simply see a more efficient way to monetize human misery.

Ultimately, we are left to watch this battle of the titans with the weary resignation of those who know that no matter who wins, we lose. If O’Leary remains, we continue to be treated like cattle. If Musk buys the ranch, we become 'X-branded' cattle with high-speed access to his latest grievances. It is a choice between a man who wants to charge you for the toilet and a man who wants to put a chip in your brain so he can know when you need to go. One is a miser, the other is a megalomaniac, and both are entirely convinced that they are the heroes of a story that the rest of us are desperately trying to stop reading.

This story is an interpreted work of social commentary based on real events. Source: The Guardian

Distribute the Absurdity

Enjoying the Apocalypse?

Journalism is dead, but our server costs are very much alive. Throw a coin to your local cynic to keep the lights on while we watch the world burn.

Tax Deductible? Probably Not.

Comments (0)

Loading comments...