Breaking News: Reality is crumbling

The Daily Absurdity

Unfiltered. Unverified. Unbelievable.

Home/Americas

Eccles Building Eviction: The Orange Emperor vs. The Spreadsheet Clergy

Buck Valor
Written by
Buck ValorPersiflating Non-Journalist
Tuesday, August 26, 2025
Share this story
A satirical, high-detail illustration of Donald Trump wearing a crown made of gold-plated tweets, holding a giant chainsaw labeled 'DEMOLITION', attempting to cut through the massive, stone pillars of the Federal Reserve building. In the background, a group of stoic, bespectacled economists in gray suits hold up spreadsheets as shields. The sky is a chaotic mix of red and blue storm clouds, with dollar bills blowing away like dead leaves.

In the latest episode of America’s favorite long-running tragicomedy, 'How Much Faster Can We Sink the Ship?', the President-elect has decided that the Federal Reserve—that windowless temple of boredom and interest-rate hexes—needs a bit of a decorative overhaul. At the center of the crosshairs is Lisa Cook, a woman whose primary crime, in the eyes of the current administration-to-be, is possessing a functioning cerebral cortex and a seat on the Board of Governors. The move to 'fire' Cook is less a strategic economic maneuver and more the act of a man trying to fix a Swiss watch with a chainsaw because he doesn't like the ticking sound.

Let’s be clear: the Federal Reserve is a collection of high-status technocrats who spend their days debating the philosophical implications of a quarter-point basis shift while the rest of the country wonders if they’ll need a second mortgage to buy a carton of eggs. They are the high priests of a secular religion called 'The Economy,' a complex system of smoke and mirrors designed to make us believe that someone, somewhere, actually knows what they’re doing. Then comes Trump, a man who views the concept of 'independence' as a personal slur, seeking to treat the central bank like a failing franchise of a mediocre steakhouse. His attempt to oust Cook is the ultimate expression of his disdain for anyone who dares to use data instead of 'gut feeling'—the same gut feeling that brought us the USFL and several bankrupt casinos.

The legal precedent for this is, predictably, non-existent. The Fed was designed to be independent specifically to prevent politicians from printing money like it’s confetti every time their polling numbers dip below the level of a room-temperature IQ. Fed governors can only be removed 'for cause,' a legal term that usually implies something like embezzling the gold bars from the basement or perhaps a public display of competence. Being 'an appointee of the other guy' generally doesn't qualify, though in our current hyper-partisan rot, the mere act of existing while holding a different worldview is considered a capital offense.

The Left is currently engaged in its traditional ritual of performative hand-wringing. They treat the Federal Reserve as if it were a sacred site of ancient wisdom, conveniently forgetting that these same governors have overseen a wealth gap that could swallow the Grand Canyon and an inflation spike that turned 'middle class' into a historical reenactment hobby. They defend Cook not because they understand her work—most couldn't tell a repo rate from a retail store—but because she represents the 'Expert Class' they use to justify their own sense of moral superiority. To them, Cook is a martyr in a blazer; to the rest of us, she’s just another person in a suit who hasn’t figured out how to stop our paychecks from shrinking.

On the other side, the MAGA sycophants are cheering this as a blow against the 'Deep State.' It’s a hilarious delusion. They believe that by removing one academic and replacing her with a loyalist who will presumably set interest rates based on the President’s morning mood, they will somehow achieve economic utopia. In reality, they are just handing the car keys to a toddler who hates the brakes. They want 'lower rates' because they want the sugar high of a booming stock market, consequences be damned. They are the people who would sell the house to buy more lighter fluid for the barbecue.

This entire conflict is a perfect microcosm of our collective decline. On one hand, you have the stale, ivory-tower arrogance of the Fed, where people like Cook believe that their models of 'rational actors' actually reflect a world full of screaming idiots. On the other, you have the brute-force ignorance of the Trump machine, which views the entire global financial system as a nuisance that keeps them from doing whatever they want at any given moment. Neither side cares about the stability of the dollar or the long-term health of the nation; they care about dominance.

So, as the President-elect prepares his latest legal assault on the Eccles Building, remember that there are no heroes here. There is only a battle between two different types of failure. Whether Cook stays or goes, the end result is the same: the system remains a Rube Goldberg machine of debt and delusion, and the people at the top will continue to play games with the levers while the rest of us get crushed in the gears. It’s not a war for the Fed’s soul; it’s a fight over who gets to drive the hearse.

This story is an interpreted work of social commentary based on real events. Source: The Economist

Distribute the Absurdity

Enjoying the Apocalypse?

Journalism is dead, but our server costs are very much alive. Throw a coin to your local cynic to keep the lights on while we watch the world burn.

Tax Deductible? Probably Not.

Comments (0)

Loading comments...