Syria's One-Year Anniversary of Nothingness: A Masterclass in the Futility of 'After'


A full year has passed since the monumental collapse of the Assad regime, and the global collective of performative hand-wringers is shocked—simply shocked—to discover that gravity still works. The keystone was pulled from a bridge made of skulls, the entire structure predictably fell into the ravine, and now we are staring at the rubble with the vacant expression of a goldfish. The news cycle tells us that Syrians are returning to a country with 'no clear plan for rebuilding.' This is the linguistic equivalent of saying a man falling out of a plane has no 'clear plan' for his sudden introduction to the pavement. It’s not an oversight; it’s the natural conclusion of a tragedy written by idiots and directed by monsters.
Let’s look at the players in this theater of the absurd. On one side, we have the 'international community,' that amorphous blob of bureaucratic careerists who spent a decade tweeting hashtags about liberation. Now that the liberation has actually occurred, they’ve realized that providing a bag of cement doesn't offer the same dopamine hit as a viral infographic. They’ve moved on to the next aesthetic crisis, leaving the Syrian people to navigate a landscape that looks more like the surface of the moon than a sovereign state. The Left’s obsession with the 'purity' of the revolution has met the cold, hard reality that you cannot eat ideological purity, nor can you use it to reinforce a load-bearing wall shattered by a decade of Russian-made munitions.
On the other side of the aisle, the hawks of the Right—perpetually horny for 'regime change' until the bill actually arrives—are now grumbling about the 'instability' they helped curate. They wanted the dictator gone because he was bad for the brand, but they have no interest in the tedious, expensive work of state-building. To them, a country is just a resource extraction site with a flag. If the oil isn't flowing and the pipelines aren't secure, the human beings living in the wreckage are merely statistical noise. They view the lack of a 'rebuilding plan' as a failure of local initiative, as if a population traumatized by fifty years of hereditary psychopathy should just 'bootstrap' a functioning power grid out of sheer willpower.
This lack of a plan is not a bug; it is the ultimate feature of the modern geopolitical era. We are excellent at destruction—it’s the one thing humanity has truly mastered—but we are pathologically incapable of construction. We treat history like a superhero movie where the credits roll the moment the villain is toppled. We ignore the fact that the villain was the only thing holding the plumbing together. The House of Assad was a grotesque, blood-stained edifice, but it was at least an edifice. What replaced it is a vacuum, and as any basic physics student can tell you, nature abhors a vacuum. Into this void step the usual suspects: the opportunistic warlords, the fanatical remnants, and the disparate militias who have discovered that 'Not Being Assad' is not actually a functional economic policy.
The returning refugees are perhaps the most tragic figures in this farce. Driven out of 'civilized' nations that viewed them as a demographic contagion, they return to a home that exists only in their memories. They find their neighborhoods reduced to grey dust, their property rights a joke told by men with Kalashnikovs, and their future a blank page being written by the wind. They are trading the indignity of foreign camps for the desolation of a homeland that has forgotten how to be a country. And why should it remember? The institutions are gone, the professionals have fled to Berlin or Toronto, and the remaining 'leadership' is too busy bickering over the scrap metal of the old world to design a blueprint for the new one.
To speak of 'rebuilding' in this context is an insult to the English language. You rebuild a shed; you don't rebuild a decimated soul. The 'struggle' we are witnessing is the slow, agonizing realization that there is no 'After'—there is only the long, permanent consequence of the 'Before.' We sit in our comfortable armchairs, critiquing the lack of a plan as if it were a minor administrative error, while the reality is far more terrifying: no one knows what to do because the damage is total. We have reached the end of the line, where the only thing left to do is watch the dust settle on a civilization that was sacrificed on the altar of global apathy and local incompetence. Happy anniversary, Syria. The void is exactly as deep as we promised it would be.
This story is an interpreted work of social commentary based on real events. Source: NY Times