Breaking News: Reality is crumbling

The Daily Absurdity

Unfiltered. Unverified. Unbelievable.

Home/Americas

Efficiency for Me, Surveillance for Thee: DOGE’s Data-Mining Grift Hits the Sunlight

Buck Valor
Written by
Buck ValorPersiflating Non-Journalist
Wednesday, January 21, 2026
Share this story
A high-contrast, cynical editorial illustration. A golden 'DOGE' coin being used as a magnifying glass by a faceless bureaucrat to burn a hole through a Social Security card. In the background, a chaotic mix of server racks and 18th-century government columns, with a tech-billionaire shadow looming over the scene. Sharp lines, acid-green and deep black color palette, gritty texture.
(Original Image Source: independent.co.uk)

In a display of bureaucratic transparency so unintentional it borders on the miraculous, the Trump Department of Justice has finally admitted what anyone with a functional prefrontal cortex already suspected: the 'Department of Government Efficiency' (DOGE) is less about streamlining the post office and more about weaponizing your personal data for the next electoral meltdown. It seems at least one staffer embedded within Elon Musk’s high-octane wrecking ball—specifically tasked with 'improving' the Social Security Administration—was caught red-handed signing off on a 'voter data agreement' with a right-wing activist group. You know, the kind of group that views the 2020 election results as a creative writing exercise rather than a historical fact.

Let us pause to admire the sheer, unadulterated gall of the maneuver. Under the guise of 'trimming the fat' and 'disrupting the legacy systems' of the federal government, we have a tech-bro vanguard using their unfettered access to the Social Security database to feed the maws of partisan operatives. It is a masterclass in the very cronyism they claim to despise. The Right spends decades screaming about the 'Deep State' and the 'surveillance apparatus' of the federal government, only to immediately hand the keys of that very apparatus to a collection of private equity ghouls and Silicon Valley narcissists. It turns out the 'Deep State' isn't a problem for them as long as the people running the cameras are wearing MAGA hats and charging the government a consulting fee to do it.

But don't for a second think the Left comes out of this looking like anything other than a collection of bewildered decorative plants. Their reaction to this blatant violation of public trust is, as always, a mix of performative pearl-clutching and frantic fundraising emails. They will hold a series of televised hearings where they will look 'deeply concerned' into the cameras, while simultaneously being terrified that if they actually pass meaningful data privacy laws, they won't be able to use their own predatory algorithms to micro-target swing voters in the next cycle. They aren't upset that the data is being harvested; they’re just upset they didn't get to harvest it first. It’s a battle between two different types of vultures fighting over the same rotting carcass of American privacy.

The Department of Justice’s admission is a rare moment of honesty in a town built on a foundation of strategic lying. By acknowledging that a DOGE staffer was effectively moonlighting as a data broker for election-denying hobbyists, the DOJ has inadvertently revealed the true mission of Musk’s 'efficiency' drive. It isn't about saving the taxpayer three cents on a stamp; it’s about the 'efficient' transfer of state power into private, partisan hands. The Social Security Administration holds the most intimate details of nearly every American citizen—birth dates, income, family ties—and the DOGE crew treats it like a free-to-play mobile game where the prize is total political control.

This is the inevitable result of the 'Move Fast and Break Things' philosophy applied to the delicate machinery of governance. When you invite 'disruptors' into the vault, don't act shocked when they start disrupting the locks. Musk and his hand-picked cohorts operate on a level of intellectual superiority so fragile that any dissent is viewed as 'inefficiency.' In their world, a fair election is inefficient because it allows for the possibility of them losing. Therefore, the 'efficient' solution is to use government resources to ensure the 'correct' outcome. It’s the kind of logic usually reserved for banana republics and high-school student council elections, yet here it is, sanctified by the highest levels of the American executive branch.

The irony is almost too heavy to carry. The very people who claim to be 'saving democracy' from the 'woke mob' are currently caught using the Social Security files of the elderly to help a group of activists try to overturn the results of the democratic process. It is a snake eating its own tail, and then complaining that the tail tastes like treason. We are living through a period where 'efficiency' is just a brand name for authoritarianism with better PR. The American electorate, ever the glutton for punishment, continues to fall for the grift, believing that a man who can’t keep a social media platform from hemorrhaging advertisers is somehow the right person to restructure the entire federal bureaucracy.

Ultimately, this DOJ admission is just another log on the bonfire of our collective stupidity. We have allowed our government to become a playground for billionaires who view the citizenry as nothing more than data points to be manipulated. The Right will claim this was a 'lone wolf' staffer or a 'clerical error,' while the Left will scream about the end of the world while doing absolutely nothing to stop it. And in the middle are the rest of us, whose most private information is now being traded in the dark corners of political war rooms, all in the name of making the government run 'more like a business.' If this is how they run a business, it’s no wonder they’re so obsessed with bankruptcy laws.

This story is an interpreted work of social commentary based on real events. Source: The Independent

Distribute the Absurdity

Enjoying the Apocalypse?

Journalism is dead, but our server costs are very much alive. Throw a coin to your local cynic to keep the lights on while we watch the world burn.

Tax Deductible? Probably Not.

Comments (0)

Loading comments...