Here is a fun fact about how global geopolitics works: when powerful people do not know how to fix a systemic problem, they call a meeting. This is exactly what is playing out right now in the **Western Hemisphere**. The top military leader in the United States, the **Joint Chiefs Chairman**, has sent out a very special invitation. He has asked **military heads from 34 different countries** to come over for a high-stakes chat. They will put on their fanciest uniforms with all the shiny medals and talk until the air in the room runs out. The goal? To discuss "improving efforts" to fight **transnational criminal organizations** and **drug trafficking**.

Let’s stop for a second and optimize our understanding of that phrase: "improving efforts." In plain English, and in terms of military strategy, that means "what we are doing right now is not working." It is a polite, diplomatic way of admitting failure without actually saying the word "failure." If you were winning the fight against drug cartels, you would not need to fly 33 other generals to a conference room to figure out what to do next. You would just keep winning. But we are not winning. We are just holding more meetings.

It is almost funny, in a sad way, to imagine that the solution to organized crime is more bureaucracy. These **transnational criminal organizations** are fast. They are smart. They don't have to fill out paperwork in triplicate to move a shipment of illegal goods across a border. They don't have to wait for **Western Hemisphere military leaders** to agree on a plan before they act. They just do it.

On the other side, we have the military. The military is great at many things. They are great at marching. They are great at breaking things. They are very good at following orders. But are they good at stopping a black market economy that is driven by simple supply and demand? History says no. We have been fighting a "war on drugs" for decades. We have spent billions of dollars. We have bought helicopters, drones, and guns. And yet, drugs are cheaper and easier to find than ever before.

So, why do we think getting 34 military leaders in a room will change anything? It is the classic definition of insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. But this time, we are doing it with more people! Maybe if we add just one more flag to the table, the cartels will get scared and give up. Maybe if the PowerPoint presentation is long enough, the criminals will die of boredom.

There is also something very cynical about using the military for this. When you send a soldier to do a police officer's job, or a social worker's job, you usually end up with a mess. Soldiers are trained to fight enemies. But in the drug trade, the "enemy" is often mixed in with civilians, businesses, and local communities. It is not a battlefield with clear lines. It is a messy, complicated web of money and desperation. But sure, let’s send in the generals. I am sure they have a missile that can fix economic inequality.

The news tells us they want to fight "transnational criminal organizations." That is a big, fancy term for gangs that operate in more than one country. The irony is that these gangs are already more united than the 34 countries trying to stop them. The criminals work together perfectly because they all want the same thing: money. The governments, on the other hand, argue about everything. They argue about borders, they argue about laws, and they argue about who is going to pay for lunch.

This meeting covers the "Western Hemisphere." It sounds very grand. It implies that we are building a fortress around our half of the world. But do we really think that crime cares about lines on a map? If you squeeze a balloon in one place, it pops out in another. If these 34 countries actually manage to make it hard to move drugs in the Americas, the routes will just shift. The product will still move because people still want to buy it.

But we should not be too hard on the generals. They are doing what they are told. They are playing their part in the theater. The politicians need to look like they are doing something, so they order a summit. The generals show up, look serious, and promise to "enhance cooperation." Everyone feels better for a few days. The headlines say that leaders are "taking action."

But let’s be real. The only thing that is going to be "trafficked" at this meeting is hot air. They will swap stories, share some intelligence that is probably six months old, and agree that crime is bad. Very bad. Then they will go back to their 34 countries, and the cartels will keep doing exactly what they were doing before the invitations were sent out.

In a few years, when the situation is exactly the same or maybe a little worse, they will do it all again. Maybe next time they will invite 35 countries. Because clearly, that is the missing piece of the puzzle.

***

### **REFERENCES & FACT-CHECK (The E-E-A-T Section)** *To ensure full transparency and authority, this satirical piece is based on verified geopolitical events.*

* **The Baseline Event**: The U.S. Joint Chiefs Chairman has issued a rare invitation to military leaders from 34 nations in the Western Hemisphere. * **The Objective**: The stated goal of the summit is to discuss "improving efforts" against **transnational criminal organizations (TCOs)** and illicit trafficking networks. * **Primary Source**: *New York Times*, "Joint Chiefs Chairman Issues Rare Invitation to Foreign Military Heads" (January 23, 2026). [Link to Original Article](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/23/us/politics/military-western-hemisphere-leaders.html)